Here are the latest blog posts on Webmaster220 Bible Study Blog

powered by Surfing Waves

Thursday, July 13, 2023

Systematic Theology block quote on the Holy Spirit by Henry Clarence Thiessen



4. The Holy Spirit is recognized us God. II. He is a person. Before it can be demonstrated that the Holy Spirit is God, it must first be established that he is a person, not a mere influence or divine power. This is done along the following lines: (1) Personal pronouns are used of him. Though the Greek term for spirit is neuter, Jesus in John 14:26 and 16:13f. used the masculine demonstrative pronoun “he” (that one) of the Holy Spirit. (2) He is called Helper (Comforter). This designation is applied both to the Holy Spirit (John
14:16,26;15:26;16:7) and to Christ(John 14:16;1 John 2:1), andsinceit expressed personality when applied to Christ, it must do so also when applied to the Spirit. (3) Personal characteristics are ascribed to him. He has the three essential elements of personality: intellect (1 Cor. 2:11), sensibilities (Rom. 8:27; 15:30), and will (1 Cor. 12:ll).
(4) Personal acts are performed by him. He regenerates (John 3:5), teaches (John 14:26), bears witness (John 15:26), convicts (John 16:8-ll), guides into truth (John 16:13), glorifies Christ (John 16:14), calls man into service (Acts 13 :2), speaks (Acts 13:2 ; Rev. 2: 7), directs men in service (Acts The Nature of God: Unity and Trinity      97
16:6f.), intercedes (Rom. 8:26), searches out (1 Cor. 2:10), and works (1 Cor. 12:ll). (5) He relates to the Father and the Son as a person. This is the case in the baptismal formula (Matt. 28:19), in the apostolic benediction (2 Cor. 13: 14), and in his office as administrator of the church (1 Cor. 12:4-6; cf. also 1 Pet. 1:lf.; Jude 20f.).
(6) He is susceptible of personal treatment. He can be tempted (Acts 5 : 9), lied to (Acts 5:3), grieved (Eph. 4:30; Isa. 63:10), resisted (Acts 7:51), insulted (Heb. 10:29), and blasphemed (Matt. 12:31f.). (7) He is distinguished from his own power (Acts 10:38; Rom. 15:13; 1 Cor. 2:4). All these things prove that the Holy Spirit is a person, not a mere influence.
b. He is deity. He is not, however, merely a person. He is a divine person. This can be shown in several ways: (1) Attributes of deity are affirmed of him. He is eternal (Heb. 9:14), omniscient (1 Cor. 2:lOf.; John 14:26; 16:12f.), omnipotent (Luke 1:35), and omnipresent (Ps. 139:7-10). (2) Works of deity are ascribed to him, such as creation (Gen. 1: 2 ; Job 33 : 4 ; Ps.
104:30), regeneration (John 3:5), inspiration of the Scriptures (2 Pet. 1:21; cf. Acts 1:16; 28:25), and raising of the dead (Rom. 8:ll). (3) The way in which he is associated with the Father and the Son proves not only his personality, but also his deity, as in the baptismal formula (Matt. 28: 19), the apostolic benediction (2 Cor. 13:14), and the administration of the church (1 Cor. 12:4-6).
(4) The words and works of the Holy Spirit are considered as the words and works of God (cf. Isa. 6:9f. with John 12:3941 and Acts 28:25-27; Exod.
16:7 with Ps. 95:8-11; Isa. 63:9f. with Heb. 3:7-9; Gen. 1:27 with Job 33:4. (5) Finally, he is expressly called God (Acts 5:3f. ; 2 Cor. 3: 17f.). Other divine names are also given to him (cf. Exod. 17: 7 with Heb. 3:7-9; and 2 Tim. 3: 16 with 2 Pet. 1:21). AI1 these references prove that the Holy Spirit, equally with the Father and the Son, is God. In church history some opposition to the doctrine of the deity of the Holy Spirit has arisen. Arius and his followers held that the Holy Spirit was created by the Son; Macedonius, Bishop of Constantinople from A.D. 341-360, and his followers held that the
Holy Spirit was a creature subordinate to the Son ; and later, Socinus propounded that he was the eternal manifestation of Gods power.
Orthodox Christianity has always held to the deity of the Holy Spirit. The
Council of Constantinople (381) affirmed this doctrine, just as the Council of Nicaea (325) clarified the doctrine of the deity of Christ. These are considered the first two general councils of the church.
As Jesus Christ is the Son of God, so the Spirit is the Spirit of God. An early controversy (Fihoque Controversy) in the church concerned the procession of the Holy Spirit. Did the Spirit proceed from the Father or from the Father and the Son? The Council of Toledo (589) acknowledged the Spirit’s procession from both the Father and the Son. This doctrine is established in
    
/ :..Theology
LWO ways: Jesus declared that he would send the Spirit (John 15: 26), and the Spirit is called the Spirit of Christ (Rom. 8:9), of Jesus (Acts 16:7), and of his Son (Gal. 4:6).





The Pro-Life Guy's Podcast Episode 145 Pro-Lifers Should Fix Problems, Not Ban Abortion Embed Widget


My name is Cam, I'm a guy who's passionate about ending the killing of pre-born children, and this is a podcast dedicated to giving you the tools you need to change minds and save lives from abortion. I work for a pro-life organization called the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform (CCBR), and together with my colleagues have reached millions of Canadians with the truth about abortion. Join me as I breakdown all the pro-choice justifications for abortion and share how we navigate them on the streets with clarity and compassion. I'll also talk to leaders in the movement and experts within fields that impact the abortion conversation to hear their stories and learn from them!


Warn, Warning as defined by Mounce and BDAG

WARN, WARNING Old Testament Noun: עֵדוּת (ʿēdût), GK 6343 (S 5715), 61×. ʿēdût, usually translated “testimony,” is closely connected to God’s law. In the Pentateuch, this noun describes the two tablets containing the Ten Commandments. Generally, outside the Pentateuch ʿēdût is a more generic reference to law (1 Ki. 2:3; 2 Ki. 23:3; 1 Chr. 29:19), perhaps with the physical tablets of the Ten Commandments in the background. In this sense, the plural of ʿēdût may be translated “requirements, warnings, regulations, or decrees.” See testimony. New Testament Verb: διαμαρτύρομαι (diamartyromai), GK 1371 (S 1263), 15×. This is an intensified compound of the verb martyreō (“to testify”). It means “to testify, warn” in the case of important matters and situations of extreme danger. See testify. Verb: διαστέλλω (diastellō) GK 1403 (S 1291), 7×. diastellō means “to command with authority” (see command, commandment). But it can also mean “to warn,” as when Jesus warns his disciples against the yeast of the Pharisees (Mk. 8:15). Verb: νουθετέω (noutheteō), GK 3805 (S 3560), 8×. noutheteō means “to warn.” As Paul makes plain in his farewell speech to the elders of Ephesus, one important aspect of his ministry was to “warn” believers of the dangers of heresy and of falling away from the faith (Acts 20:31). He himself had to warn the Corinthians (1 Cor. 4:14) and the Thessalonians (2 Thess. 3:15; cf. 1 Thess. 5:14) of this danger. noutheteō also means “to admonish” (see admonish). Verb: προλέγω (prolegō), GK 4625 (S 4302, 4277, 4280), 15×. prolegō refers to saying something in advance of an event. It sometimes has the nuance of “to warn.” See say before.

William D. Mounce, Mounce’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old & New Testament Words (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2006), 774–775.




διαμαρτύρομαι fut. διαμαρτυροῦμαι (Just., D. 22, 8 [Ps. 49:7]); 1 aor. διεμαρτυράμην (since X., Pla. et al.; pap, LXX; TestZeb 7:1) gener. to state something in such a way that the auditor is to be impressed with its seriousness.
① to make a solemn declaration about the truth of someth. testify of, bear witness to (orig. under oath) (X., Hell. 3, 2, 13) τινί τι (Ezk 16:2 διαμάρτυραι τῇ Ἰερουσαλὴμ τὰς ἀνομίας αὐτῆς.—En 104:11 διαμαρτυρέομαί τινί τι; cp. Jos., Ant. 9, 167) of repentance to Judeans and Hellenes Ac 20:21. τὶ the gospel vs. 24; God’s kingdom 28:23; my cause in Jerusalem 23:11. Abs. 8:25; 1 Th 4:6. W. λέγων foll. Ac 20:23; Hb 2:6. W. ὅτι foll. (PSI 422, 7 [III B.C.]) Ac 10:42. W. acc. and inf. foll. Ac 18:5.
② to exhort with authority in matters of extraordinary importance, freq. w. ref. to higher powers and/or suggestion of peril, solemnly urge, exhort, warn (X., Cyr. 7, 1, 17; Polyb. 3, 110, 4; Diod S 18, 62, 2; Plut., Cim. 489 [16, 9]; Jos., Ant. 6, 39 al.; Ex 19:10, 21; 1 Km 8:9; 2 Ch 24:19 al.) w. dat. of pers. addressed warn δ. αὐτοῖς Lk 16:28 (w. ἵνα μή foll.). W. ἐνώπιον τ. θεοῦ charge 1 Ti 5:21 (ἵνα); 2 Ti 2:14 (μή w. inf. as Polyb. 1, 33, 5; Plut., Crass. 533 [16, 6]). Abs. Ac 2:40. W. two constr. mixed: δ. ἐνώπιον θεοῦ καὶ Ἰ. Χ. καὶ τὴν ἐπιφάνειαν αὐτοῦ I charge you before God and J. Chr., and by his appearing 2 Ti 4:1. διαμαρτυρομένου ταῦτα Παύλου while Paul was earnestly entreating (God) for this (release from his bonds) AcPl Ha 3, 12 (cp. X., Cyr. 7, 1, 9).—DMacDowell, The Law in Classical Athens, ’78, 212–19.—DELG s.v. μάρτυς. M-M. TW.


fut. fut. = future

Just. Just(in) , II A.D.—List 5

Ps. Ps. = pseudo, pseudonymous

aor. aor. = aorist

X. X. = Xenophon, V–IV B.C.—List 5

Pla Pla , V–IV B.C.; s. also Ps.-Plato—List 5

et al. et al. = et alii (and others)

pap pap = papyrus, -yri 

LXX LXX = Septuaginta, ed. ARahlfs, unless otherwise specified—Lists 2, beg.

TestZeb TestZeb = Testament of Zebulon, s. Test12Patr—List 2

gener. gener. = generally

someth. someth. = something

orig. orig. = original(ly)

X. X. = Xenophon, V–IV B.C.—List 5

En En = I Enoch—List 2  

cp. cp. = compare, freq. in ref. to citation fr. ancient texts

Jos. Jos. = Josephus. This abbr. used when follow by title; I A.D.—Lists 5

foll. foll. = followed, following

foll. foll. = followed, following

PSI PSI = Papiri greci e latini: Pubblicazioni della Società Italiana—List 4

acc. acc. = accusative

inf. inf. = infinitive

foll. foll. = followed, following

freq. freq. = frequent(ly)

w. w. = with

ref. ref. = reference(s)

X. X. = Xenophon, V–IV B.C.—List 5

Polyb Polyb , III–II B.C.—List 5

Diod S Diod S , I B.C.—List 5

Plut Plut , I–II A.D.—List 5

Jos. Jos. = Josephus. This abbr. used when follow by title; I A.D.—Lists 5

al. al. =alibi (elsewhere), aliter (otherwise), alii (others)

al. al. =alibi (elsewhere), aliter (otherwise), alii (others)

w. w. = with

dat. dat. = dative

pers. pers. = person(s)

w. w. = with

foll. foll. = followed, following

w. w. = with

inf. inf. = infinitive

Polyb Polyb , III–II B.C.—List 5

Plut Plut , I–II A.D.—List 5

constr. constr. = construction

AcPl Ha AcPl Ha = Acts of Paul, PHamb—List 1

cp. cp. = compare, freq. in ref. to citation fr. ancient texts

X. X. = Xenophon, V–IV B.C.—List 5

DELG DELG = PChantraine, Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque—List 6

s.v. s.v. = sub voce (under the word, look up the word)

M-M M-M = JMoulton/GMilligan, Vocabulary of Greek Testament—Lists 4, 6

TW TW = Theologisches Wörterbuch zum NT; tr. GBromiley, Theological Dictionary of the NT—List 6



I think you will like Logos! Get $100 off a Logos 10 base package (first-time base package purchasers only) from my link: https://logos.refr.cc/ricklivermore?t=em



https://rick-livermore-on-blogger.blogspot.com/

The Word of God

22. The Word of God John Uses it as a name for our Lord (1:1). There are three words in the Greek language for “word,” one referring to the mere articulate sound of the voice, another speaking of that sound as the manifestation of a mental state, and still another, the one used by John, and whose meaning will be discussed. The word is Logos (Λογος). It comes from the verb which means literally “to pick out or select,” thus “to pick words in order to express one’s thoughts,” thus “to speak.” It speaks of a word uttered by the human voice which embodies a conception or idea. It refers not merely to a part of speech but to a concept or idea. Greek philosophers, in attempting to understand the relationship between God and the universe, spoke of an unknown mediator between God and the universe, naming this mediator, “Logos (Λογος).” John tells them that this mediator unknown to them is our Lord, and he uses the same name “Logos (Λογος).” Our Lord is the Logos (Λογος) of God in the sense that He is the total concept of God, Deity speaking through the Son of God, not in parts of speech as in a sentence composed of words, but in the human life of a divine Person. Our Lord said, “He that hath seen me hath seen the Father,” Paul says that (Heb. 1:1–2) whereas in times past God spoke to Israel using the prophets as mouthpieces, He now has spoken in the Person of His Son. Our Lord is therefore the Word of God in that He is Deity told out. The definite article appears before “Word.” He is not merely a concept of God among many others, for the heathen have many concepts of God. He is THE concept of God, the only true one, the unique one. He was in existence when things started to come into being through the creative act of God. He existed before all created things. Therefore, He is uncreated, and therefore eternal in His being, and therefore God. The Word was with God. The word “with” is from a preposition meaning literally “facing.” Thus the Word is a Person facing God the Father. The article appears before the word “God” in the Greek, which indicates that the First Person of the Trinity is meant. Thus, John is speaking of the fellowship between the Word, Jesus Christ, and the Father, a fellowship that existed from all eternity and will exist to all eternity, and which was never broken except at that dark mysterious moment at Calvary when the Son cried, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” The Word was God. Here the word “God” is without the article in the original. When it is used in that way, it refers to divine essence. Emphasis is upon quality or character. Thus, John teaches us here that our Lord is essentially Deity. He possesses the same essence as God the Father, is one with Him in nature and attributes. Jesus of Nazareth, the carpenter, the teacher, is Very God. “In the beginning was the Word (total concept of God), and the Word was in constant fellowship with God (the Father), and the Word was (as to His essence or nature) God.”

Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest’s Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: For the English Reader, vol. 17 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 50–52.


A Contradiction Cleared Up by the Greek

15. A Contradiction Cleared Up by the Greek Luke Who wrote the Book of Acts, records for us under the superintendence of the Holy Spirit, Paul’s experience on the road to Damascus, as he heard it from the lips of Paul himself (Acts 9). Luke also records Paul’s speech of defense to the Jews (Acts 22) as he heard it from Paul. In 9:7 the statement is made that the men with Paul heard the voice of the One speaking to him, and in Acts 22:9, that they did not hear the voice. Here we have a real contradiction in the English translation. We believe in an infallible inspired text. We claim verbal inspiration for the original Hebrew and Greek manuscripts, and for our present day manuscripts where textual criticism assures us of a correct text, which is in the case of the New Testament, 999 words out of every one thousand. We do not claim verbal inspiration for any translation. Therefore, the Greek text is the final court of appeal. In the Greek of Acts 9:7, the word “voice” is in the genitive case, and in Acts 22:9, it is in the accusative case. The grammar rule here states that in the first instance, the voice is heard only as a sound. The meaning of the words are not understood. The men with Paul heard the sound but did not understand the words which our Lord spoke to Paul. It states in the second instance, that not only is the voice heard, but the words are understood. Thus the men with Paul did not hear the voice so as to understand the words. The contradiction is not a contradiction in the Greek text. Child of God, trust your Bible. It is the very Word of God, given by revelation and written down by inspiration.

Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest’s Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: For the English Reader, vol. 17 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 40–41. 

Announcing: Commissioned partnership between Logos Bible Software and Rick Livermore

Chat Window

Blog Archive

Labels

Visit our Business District

The Crossway Podcast

About Me

My photo
San Juan Capistrano, California, United States
Jesus Christ is alive and living in the hearts and lives of billions of Christians. I am interested in what He is saying and doing in the lives of those who know and love Him and interested in being a familiar and trusted blogger about Him